Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Why Research Matters


Over the last few weeks I have found myself answering this question numerous times for both potential students and their families and for members of the local community. At first blush it might appear to many that the sole purpose of a university is to teach students how to prepare for productive lives, careers, and engaged citizenship. Why, given this goal, would it matter if the faculty members at a given university are engaged in research? Indeed, some might logically argue, less time devoted to research would actually free up more time for teaching (after all, many believe, a faculty member’s job is a cushy one—teach a few classes, grade a few papers/exams, take a sabbatical every five years, enjoy summers off).

This is a line of thinking that I am very familiar with and it is one that misses an incredibly important point—faculty engaged in research are actually better classroom instructors and student mentors than those who are not. It is one thing to teach material from a text or the steps in a particular process, it is altogether another thing to do this from the perspective of one who helped to shape that text or who actually employs a given process on a regular basis. Students can find a good classroom experience at a great many universities. What they cannot find as readily, however, is a classroom experience where the instruction is informed by researchers who are actively involved in impactful, cutting edge research. This is exactly the type of classroom experience, however, that the College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters offers its students. Our faculty members are not just talented teachers they are also engaged scholars who are making important contributions in their respective fields. They infuse the excitement they feel about their work, the work’s impact in moving a field forward, and their love of pedagogy together into a powerful combination that truly sets a CASL experience apart from that of other universities and colleges. It is this point that I emphasize time and time again. It is, in my mind, the CASL difference and it stands at the core of why a CASL education is so impactful for so many. Our students are challenged to think about new things, new perspectives, and new approaches to problems. They are invited to play a role in the academic dialog and, in many cases, to participate in that dialog as research partners. This prepares them to step confidently into the world beyond CASL (whether it be professional school, graduate school, or the world of work) and to meet that world with the tools that they need to be tremendously successful.

The Association of American Colleges and Universities publication, College Learning for the New Global Century, sums this up nicely:
The key to educational excellence lies not in the memorization of vast amounts of information, but rather in fostering habits of mind that enable students to continue their learning, engage new questions, and reach informed judgments.
These are traits that can only be instilled by a faculty deeply committed to the principle that good scholarship informs good teaching.


Friday, January 29, 2016

An Academic Education

One of my colleagues recently shared with me this memorable quotation from The Catcher in the Rye:

"Something else an academic education will do for you. If you go along with it any considerable distance, it'll begin to give you an idea what size mind you have. What it'll fit and, maybe, what it won't. After a while, you'll have an idea what kind of thoughts your particular size mind should be wearing. For one thing, it may save you an extraordinary amount of time trying on ideas that don't suit you, aren't becoming to you. You'll begin to know your true measurements and dress your mind accordingly."

"Among other things, you'll find that you're not the first person who was ever confused and frightened and even sickened by human behavior. You're by no means alone on that score, you'll be excited and stimulated to know. Many, many men have been just as troubled morally and spiritually as you are right now. Happily, some of them kept records of their troubles. You'll learn from them—if you want to. Just as someday, if you have something to offer, someone will learn something from you. It's a beautiful reciprocal arrangement. And it isn't education. It's history. It's poetry."

"I'm not trying to tell you," he said, "that only educated and scholarly men are able to contribute something valuable to the world. It's not so. But I do say that educated and scholarly men, if they're brilliant and creative to begin with – which, unfortunately, is rarely the case – tend to leave infinitely more valuable records behind them than men do who are merely brilliant and creative. They tend to express themselves more clearly, and they usually have a passion for following their thoughts through to the end. And – most important – nine times out of ten they have more humility than the unscholarly thinker. Do you follow me at all?"

J.D. Salinger (through his character Mr. Antolini, in The Catcher in the Rye)

Any graduate of the College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters can tell you just how accurate this quotation is. The ability to work seamlessly across disciplines and to examine/consider questions from multiple perspectives is incredibly powerful. It is encouraging to see a number of recent articles/commentaries that speak to the power of what we do here in CASL. In this spirit I share the following piece from Forbes:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/georgeanders/2015/07/29/liberal-arts-degree-tech/3/#446488986148

Sunday, December 6, 2015

The Power of Inclusion


Recently, President Schlissel highlighted the importance of Inclusion for the University of Michigan community: “We commit to pursuing deliberate efforts to ensure that our campus is a place where differences are welcomed, different perspectives are respectfully heard and where every individual feels a sense of belonging and inclusion. We know that by building a critical mass of diverse groups on campus and creating a vibrant climate of inclusiveness, we can more effectively leverage the resources of diversity to advance our collective capabilities.”

For anyone who has spent any time at all on the UM-Dearborn campus or listening to/reading the remarks of Chancellor Little, it is abundantly evident that UM-D assumed the lead on this front long before this recent pronouncement. Indeed, for the UM-D community the idea of “Inclusion” is both well understood and widely practiced. Walking across our campus, or spending time in the University Center, one cannot help but notice the wide array of cultures, races, religions, ethnicities, and gender orientations represented among our student body and faculty. Students regularly praise this aspect of their campus and value the exposure that they have to people who are different from themselves. This attribute of UM-D positions our students to be very successful in the increasingly globalized world into which they will be stepping after they complete their studies here at the university.

It has been a source of great pride to me to listen to our students and to watch them respond to the growing wave of hate, fear, and intolerance impacting large portions of American society in light or recent events abroad and at home; much of it arguing for exclusion rather than inclusion. As so many around them denounce those they do not understand or rail against those whose views differ from their own; as friends and family take to social media to spew hatred and suspicion; as the fearmongers pander to our basest instincts, UM-Dearborn students, faculty, and staff remain steadfast in their commitment to inclusion and to the power and import of difference, tolerance, and acceptance.

I hope that you agree that this is a noble goal and one worth committing to. I am proud to be part of such a community and look forward to lending my hand to President Schlissel as he and the rest of the University of Michigan community work to build inclusiveness across the three campuses.


Sunday, November 15, 2015

Guest Blog--Flatland

A very thoughtful piece from my colleague, Associate Dean and Professor of Mathematics, Michael Lachance:


In Edwin A. Abbott’s 1884 80-page Victorian allegory and geometric treatise, Flatland: A Romance of many dimensions, he envisioned a two-dimensional universe in which there was no up or down, only north, south, east, and west. In this planar world women were represented as line segments: visible only from the side, invisible if approaching you, and hence dangerous. Only slightly superior to women were soldiers, skinny isosceles triangles. Men were regular convex polygons. Each union between man and woman would yield a son, with one more side than his father. Long-lived families would have so many sides as to become indistinguishable from circles, the priestly class. Offspring that were not regular, that did not have sides of equal lengths, were destroyed.

Enter into this scenario a sphere hovering above the planar universe. The sphere reaches out to a Mr. A. Square, and eventually persuades him of the possibility, indeed the reality, of a third dimension. With the sphere’s help Mr. Square is able to escape from the plane and to see his universe for what it is. When Mr. Square asks the sphere if there is a fourth dimension, the sphere replies that that is absurd! Puzzled by this, but excited to share his newfound insights with his countrymen, he returns to the plane and is promptly imprisoned for heresy by the priests, put under the guard of lowly soldiers.

So how does one become aware of a booklet like this? And what does one do with a story like this? What’s the point? There are a number of things brought up in this summary alone that one can seize upon: the obvious insult to women, the cruelty directed at irregular children, and the arrogance of the priests. There is also the notion of a flat universe, ignorance of directions or dimensions beyond what is evident, and the certainty that nothing exists beyond your experience.

Most folks become aware of books like this, and discuss ideas like these, in universities, and more specifically in colleges of liberal arts. Universities offer a dimension, a direction, that enables us to escape our otherwise flat land.

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Making it Count for our Students

As I was sifting through the avalanche of daily emails that flows into my inbox a couple of weeks back I happened upon one from a friend that included a link to a new Washington Monthly ranking of “Best Bang for the Buck” colleges and universities in the Midwest:

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/college_guide/rankings-other-college-guide/best-bang-for-buck-midwest-rank.php#.VecIiezwGVc.facebook

The friend sent it to me because UM-Dearborn fared very well on this list coming in at number seven for the entire region and outranking all of our state public peers, including the Ann Arbor campus. I was, of course, certainly thrilled to read this as it confirmed my own view of the special nature of what this university (and especially CASL) does so well. Reading a bit further about the rankings, however, left me a bit dissatisfied.

The rankings are based on an assessment of which schools are the best value for one’s money based on "net" (not sticker) price, how well the school does graduating the students they admit, and whether those students go on to earn at least enough income to pay off their loans. While these are certainly very important goals and I am ecstatic to see that UM-Dearborn measures up so well against this yardstick, I am also struck by how much the rankings miss in this rather singular focus of what constitutes bang for the buck. The reason why UM-Dearborn ranks so highly on this list is because of the incredible learning environment that exists on this campus. We prepare students to succeed in the world and that preparation in turn allows them to graduate, earn steady incomes, and to pay any student debt they may have accrued (our students actually accrue less debt than their typical state peers). While that rich learning environment is a hallmark of all four of the university’s colleges CASL stands at the heart of that success.

When I think about the high impact practices that help students to be successful I am happy to see CASL sets the pace for the university. Beyond the longstanding staples of co-operative education and internships CASL also offers first year seminars to incoming first year students, academic service learning courses, robust academic support and tutoring services, access to mentored student research, study abroad opportunities, and a wide array of cultural programming and co-curricular events. College faculty also played a critical role in creating and implementing the university’s new general education curriculum known as the Dearborn Discovery Core, which shifts general education away from our old menu style checklist to a more purposeful, outcomes based model that offers multiple paths more carefully aligned with individual student interests. Likewise, CASL faculty and staff are playing central roles in the university’s launch of the new Metro Talent Gateway, a new initiative designed to assist students to integrate their varied university experiences to better appreciate the synergy between academic pursuits, co-curricular activities, engagement, internships, etc. and to prepare them for life beyond the university.

There is much great work being done on this front and I am happy to add that there is much more to come. CASL is embarking upon an aggressive campaign to ramp up our student success efforts to ensure even more positive outcomes. The 2015-2016 academic year promises to be an exciting one. I look forward to working alongside of my faculty and staff colleagues to ensure that both CASL and UM-Dearborn continue to deliver excellent value to our students and to ensure that they are well positioned to be successful in whatever path they choose to travel.


Friday, May 8, 2015

From the Hill to the CASL

I am incredibly proud to announce that the College of Arts, Sciences, and Letters is entering into a partnership with former Congressman John Dingell. The longest serving congressman in U.S. history, Congressman Dingell played a key role in shaping legislation that touches every facet of American life. The former Congressman will be taking up residence on our campus and will be sharing his experience and insight into the legislative process and the operations of our government with UM-Dearborn students and faculty. Beyond his appearances in classroom settings, the former congressman will also work with our students on research projects aimed at documenting his illustrious career and will moderate a speakers series featuring some of the nation’s most important leaders.

That Congressman Dingell chose to partner with CASL and the university should come as no surprise. Dearborn, of course, is his hometown and the city long sat at the center of his congressional district. But even more than that, the congressman shared with me his deep appreciation of what we do and who we are as a university. In particular, he noted the university’s gift for transforming the lives of our students and of helping them to chart a path to success. I know I speak for many on campus when I say that we are humbled by this acknowledgment and by the congressman’s decision to join our community.

This is a proud moment for CASL and for the university. I know that Congressman Dingell will add much to our campus community.

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Our Nature: Sciences or Letters, Teacher or Scholar, Does it Really Matter?

In this entry, Associate Professor, Jorge Del Pozzo Gonzalez, in the Department of Language, Culture, and Communications, reflects on the Teacher/Scholar model:

In Spanish, as well as in English, the four P´s (in commonly used business jargon) refer to: Place, Product, Promotion and Price. In his recent piece in the Chronicle of Higher Education (see link below), Professor Rob Jenkins of Georgia Perimeter College identifies an alternate set of four P´s that he sees as the main characteristics of great teachers: Personality, Presence, Preparation and Passion. I know firsthand that many of my faculty peers in CASL exemplify these characteristics. Teaching/learning is a relationship: like a plant it requires both internal and external inputs to grow and bloom—nurturing, water, sunlight, care. Both the faculty members and the students in this relationship are constantly aware of how that relationship is evolving.

Too many people tend to dissociate teaching from research, yet the University of Michigan-Dearborn emphasizes the importance of the teacher-scholar model. How are these two activities linked and how does one inform the other? How do faculty balance these two pursuits? Students sometimes find themselves at the same crossroads: Studying or working? Additional classes or an internship? Any college of arts and sciences, particularly our very own CASL, is an ideal spot for developing and disseminating the concept of balance and connection. The link between teaching and doing research is just another relationship that needs some love in order to bloom.
Recently, in another article about careers that appeared in blogs.sciencemag.org (see link below), Dan Albert offered ten reasons why including humanities in preparation for a scientific career is crucial, and this applies to students and faculty alike.. Albert’s 1st and 4th points, “Humanities prepare you to fulfill your civic and cultural responsibilities,” and “Humanities study strengthens the ability to communicate and work with others,” respectively, address the role humanities can play in striking a balance between home and the workplace.

I’ll conclude with Albert´s 10th point: “The study of humanities teaches that the supposedly sharp dichotomies that separate sciences from humanities do not really exist.” Said another way, culture influences science and science influences culture. Whatever your career, your major, your passion, find your equilibrium, juggle all worlds possible and live them to the fullest. As a faculty member, balancing the teacher-scholar model presents its own challenges. I may not be very good at it, but I don´t think it matters: I believe demonstrating a balance is and should be our nature, our way of living. Furthermore, it should be the main way to keep up our relationship with our students in order to show them how teaching and scholarship are intricately connected, as are personal and professional success.




http://chronicle.com/article/The-4-Properties-of-Powerful/228483/